TheJournalofMusculoskeletalMedicine Members: Login | Register
TheJournalofMusculoskeletalMedicine SearchMedica Medline Drugs

Powered by SearchMedica

 
Biomechanics
Clinical Update
Citations
Geriatrics
RA Resources
Osteoarthritis
Osteoporosis
Photo Quiz
Multimedia
Patient Education
 

Home » Hypertension

The Journal of Respiratory Diseases. Vol. 30 No. October PAH Supplement
Pages: 1  2  
Next

Making the best use of MRI, CPET, and biomarkers

 

Monitoring the response to therapy for pulmonary arterial hypertension, part 2

By JAMES R. KLINGER, MD | October 21, 2009

Dr Klinger is associate professor of medicine, Warren Alpert Medical School of Brown University, and medical director, pulmonary hypertension center, division of pulmonary, sleep, and critical care medicine, Rhode Island Hospital, Providence.


ABSTRACT: MRI appears to be a useful tool for monitoring right ventricular (RV) functional responses to therapy in patients with pulmonary arterial hypertension (PAH). It can provide most of the hemodynamic measurements obtained by pulmonary artery catheterization. Cardiopulmonary exercise testing also provides important information; for example, in the non-deconditioned patient, a rise in maximal oxygen consumption strongly suggests improvement in pulmonary vascular disease. An increase in oxygen pulse suggests improving cardiopulmonary performance and, as such, can be used to monitor response to therapy. The 6-minute walking distance should be assessed every 4 to 6 months or whenever the clinician suspects that the patient’s functional status is declining. Plasma brain natriuretic peptide (BNP) levels above 200 pg/mL or troponin levels greater than 0.15 ng/mL may indicate significant RV dysfunction. An elevated BNP level at presentation indicates a worse prognosis, as does failure to reduce plasma BNP levels during treatment for PAH.


Despite the recent development of several new therapies, pulmonary arterial hypertension (PAH) remains an incurable disease. Careful monitoring of disease progression is vital to ensuring that patients receive maximal medical therapy before the onset of overt right-sided heart failure. In part 1 of this article, I reviewed the role of the history and physical examination, chest radiography, electrocardiography, echocardiography, and pulmonary artery catheterization. In part 2, I focus on MRI, cardiopulmonary exercise testing (CPET), the 6-minute walk test, and biomarkers.

MRI

This diagnostic test combines several advantages of pulmonary artery catheterization and transthoracic echocardiography (TTE). Like TTE, MRI is noninvasive and can be done repeatedly with little harm to the patient. At the same time, it can provide most of the hemodynamic measurements obtained by catheterization. Its ability to more precisely visualize right ventricular (RV) structures allows accurate measurements of RV end-diastolic and end-systolic dimensions, and computer processing of multiple cross-sectional areas provides ventricular volume and mass.

The RV ejection fraction can be calculated as the difference between RV end-diastolic volume and RV end-systolic volume. The RV stroke volume can be measured by examining volumetric flow in the pulmonary artery, and RV output can be calculated from the product of RV stroke volume and heart rate. Maximal systolic cross-sectional area and mean systolic blood flow velocity over the main pulmonary artery can be used to calculate the mean pulmonary artery pressure (PAP). Studies of patients with PAH have shown good agreement between mean PAP measured by MRI and by pulmonary artery catheterization.1

MRI can also assess RV function by generating pressure-volume loops from measurements of ventricular volumes and pressures.2 RV myocardial contractility can be assessed by the slope of the end-systolic pressure-volume relationship, a load-independent parameter of myocardial contractility.

MRI has been used to monitor improvement in RV function in numerous clinical trials in patients with PAH. Roeleveld and colleagues3 found increased RV mass, RV end-diastolic volume, and RV end-systolic volume at baseline in 9 patients with PAH. After treatment with epoprostenol(Drug information on epoprostenol), RV end-diastolic volume was unchanged, but RV stroke volume and functional capacity improved (Figure 1). Repeated right heart catheterization revealed no change in mean PAP but a significant increase in cardiac output, suggesting that epoprostenol improved performance by increasing RV contractility and reducing pulmonary vascular resistance (PVR). These findings suggest that MRI may be a useful tool for monitoring RV functional responses to therapy in patients with PAH.

Figure 1

Figure 1 – The 6-minute walking distance improves as the right ventricular stroke volume increases in patients with pulmonary arterial hypertension who were treated for 12 months with epoprostenol. (Adapted from Roeleveld RJ et al. Chest. 2004.3)

Cardiopulmonary exercise testing

CPET is a noninvasive way of assessing cardiopulmonary performance during exercise. Patients ride a stationary bike or walk a treadmill while breathing through an airtight mouthpiece that continually measures the Po2 and Pco2 of exhaled air. By measuring the volume of gas inhaled and exhaled per unit of time, oxygen consumption (Vo2) and carbon dioxide elimination (Vco2) can be measured in mL/min. Cardiac output can be determined from Vo2 based on the Fick equation:

Q = Vo2/[C(a-v)o2]

The arteriovenous oxygen difference—C(a-v)o2—cannot be determined precisely without measurement of mixed venous oxygen saturation. However, at maximal exercise, C(a-v)o2 is about 75% of total oxygen carrying capacity of the blood, which can be measured if the patient’s arterial oxygenation saturation and hemoglobin level are known. Vo2 is determined by cardiac output, pulmonary gas exchange, and the extraction and utilization of oxygen by skeletal muscle.

Patients with PAH may have impaired RV output as a result of elevated PVR as well as reduced gas exchange as a result of pulmonary vascular disease, which leads to pruning of the pulmonary vascular bed. Also, oxygen uptake and utilization are often impaired by deconditioning. Thus, an abnormal exercise test result is not uncommon in patients with PAH, and it does not indicate which part of the respiratory cycle is compromised.

However, CPET can provide important information about the overall health of the patient. In the non- deconditioned patient, a rise in maximal Vo2 strongly suggests improvement in pulmonary vascular disease and is a more objective measurement of cardiopulmonary function than a submaximal exercise test. As a result, maximal Vo2 has been used as a primary outcome measure in clinical studies of PAH.4-6 However, some studies have shown no increase in maximal Vo2 despite an increase in 6-minute walk distance.

Another way of assessing cardiac output is to divide Vo2 by the pulse rate. Considering Q = Vo2/[C(a-v)o2] and Q = SV × HR (SV is stroke volume and HR is heart rate), SV × HR = Vo2/[C(a-v)o2] or SV × [C(a-v)o2] = Vo2/HR.

Assuming that the arteriovenous oxygen difference remains constant for a given work load, stroke volume should be directly proportional to Vo2/HR. This measurement is referred to as the oxygen pulse and is used as a noninvasive method for assessing the amount of oxygen extracted per heartbeat. Normally, the oxygen pulse increases rapidly with exercise and becomes asymptotic toward maximal exercise.7 A low, flat oxygen pulse with increasing work suggests reduced stroke volume, but it can also occur from failure of the skeletal muscle to increase oxygen extraction.

Thus, a low oxygen pulse can be seen with deconditioning, cardiovascular disease, and early exercise limitation resulting from ventilatory constraint. However, in any given individual, an increase in oxygen pulse in response to therapy suggests improving cardiopulmonary performance and, as such, can be used to monitor response to therapy in patients with PAH.

In clinical studies, patients with PAH have been found to have lower mean Vo2, oxygen pulse, and anaerobic threshold and increased minute ventilation/Vco2 than controls.8,9 Furthermore, the mean Vo2 and oxygen pulse have been demonstrated to correlate closely with 6-minute walking distance and with improvement in the response to pulmonary vasodilator therapy.6,10,11

6-Minute walk test

Maximal exercise tests offer valuable information regarding peak cardiopulmonary function, but they are not suitable for use in patients with significant functional impairment. The 6-minute walk test is a submaximal stress test that was developed for monitoring exercise performance in patients with chronic heart disease to help determine their capacity to undertake day-to-day activities.12

During this test, the patient walks unassisted on a horizontal surface at a comfortable, but steady pace for 6 minutes. Patients can stop to rest as often as they feel is necessary but are instructed to continue walking as soon as they can. Guidelines on how the test should be performed have been published to ensure uniformity between testing centers and suggest that patients walk at least 100 ft in a straight line before turning around.13 Blood pressure, pulse rate, and arterial oxygen saturation are measured at the beginning and end of the test. At the conclusion of the walk, patients are asked to rate their dyspnea on a scale of 1 to 10 (Borg dyspnea score).

Miyamoto and associates10 found that the average 6-minute walking distance in patients with PAH is less than half that of healthy age- and sex-matched controls (297 m ± 188 m versus 655 m ± 91 m; P < .001). The 6-minute walking distance correlated modestly with baseline cardiac output and total pulmonary resistance, although not with PAP. A 6-minute walking distance greater than 332 m was the only noninvasive measure of pulmonary hypertension that independently predicted survival over a 2-year period. Similarly, Paciocco and associates14 found that a 6-minute walk distance of 300 m or less was associated with a 2.4-fold increase in mortality risk and a fall in oxygen saturation of 10% or more was associated with a 2.9-fold increase in mortality risk.

The 6-minute walking distance has become the standard exercise test used to assess functional response for virtually every medical therapy trial. Most trials report an average placebo-corrected increase in 6-minute walking distance of about 30 to 50 m after 3 months of therapy.15-19

In general, the patient’s 6-minute walking distance should be monitored every 4 to 6 months in patients receiving therapy for PAH, or whenever the clinician suspects that functional status is declining. In addition, most patients with PAH should perform moderate exercise regularly. We recommend patients walk for at least 6 minutes on level ground at home several times a week.

Pages: 1  2  
Next
 

Join the Conversation

Want to join the conversation? If you're a healthcare professional, we'd like to hear your comments. Just sign in or register today to become part of our growing, online community.






CancerNetwork | CME LLC | ConsultantLive | Diagnostic Imaging | Musculoskeletal Network | OBGYN.net | PediatricsConsultantLive |
Physicians Practice | Psychiatric Times | SearchMedica | Medical Resources

© 1996 - 2012 UBM Medica LLC, a UBM company
Privacy Statement - Terms of Service - Advertising Information - Editorial Policy Statement - UBM Medica Network Privacy Policy