TheJournalofMusculoskeletalMedicine Members: Login | Register
TheJournalofMusculoskeletalMedicine SearchMedica Medline Drugs

Powered by SearchMedica

 
Conferences
News
In the Journals
Gout
Osteoarthritis
Osteoporosis
Rheumatoid Arthritis
Multimedia
Photo Quiz
 


The Journal of Musculoskeletal Medicine. Vol. 28 No. 10
Pages: 1  2  
Next
Supplement 

Combination Pharmacological Management of Fibromyalgia

An individualized regimen that addresses associated symptoms is needed

By CHAD S. BOOMERSHINE, MD, PhD | October 17, 2011
Dr Boomershine is medical director of Boomershine Wellness Centers in Franklin, Tennessee, and assistant clinical professor at Vanderbilt University in Nashville.

ABSTRACT: Fibromyalgia syndrome (FMS) is a complex disorder of chronic, widespread pain and tenderness usually accompanied by numerous other symptoms, including fatigue, cognitive dysfunction, nonrestorative sleep, depression, anxiety, and stiffness. Effective FMS treatment requires management of all associated symptoms. Multiple pharmacological agents often are used in combination, but patients with FMS tend to be sensitive to medications and often have difficulty in tolerating therapeutic "cocktails." Also, medications that lessen the severity of one FMS symptom may worsen the severity of others. Information on the use of combination drug therapy in FMS is limited. Although combination pharmacotherapy is a useful approach that can improve FMS management for many patients, such therapy must be given cautiously because it carries increased risks.

__________________________________________________________________________________

The 1990 American College of Rheumatology classification criteria defined fibromyalgia syndrome (FMS) exclusively by the presence of chronic widespread pain and tenderness.1 Because of this exclusivity, treatment typically focuses on pain management. However, effective FMS management requires an individualized treatment regimen that addresses not only pain but also all associated FMS symptoms, including fatigue, cognitive dysfunction ("fibrofog"), nonrestorative sleep, depression, anxiety, and stiffness.2

To improve outcomes, a symptom-based approach has been recommended that uses several pharmacological agents to manage various FMS symptoms.3 However, patients with FMS often have difficulty in tolerating such therapeutic "cocktails," and medications that lessen the severity of one FMS symptom may worsen the severity of others.

Information on combination drug therapy in FMS management is limited. In this article, I review the risks and benefits of combination pharmacotherapy in FMS management and offer treatment recommendations.

COMBINING FMS "ANCHOR" DRUGS

FMS does not respond to the classic analgesics, such as opioids and NSAIDs, because these agents do not address the root cause of FMS—dysfunctional CNS pain processing.4 Drugs that have demonstrated effectiveness in managing FMS pain, the so-called FMS anchor drugs, may work by increasing the activity of descending inhibitory pain pathways that use serotonin and norepinephrine(Drug information on norepinephrine) (antidepressants, such as the serotonin-norepinephrine reuptake inhibitors [SNRIs] duloxetine and milnacipran; the tricyclic antidepressants [TCAs] amitriptyline and cyclobenzaprine(Drug information on cyclobenzaprine); and the first-generation selective serotonin reuptake inhibitor [SSRI] fluoxetine(Drug information on fluoxetine)). Or, they may decrease the activity of pain pathways by reducing excitatory neurotransmitter release (the anticonvulsant α2δ calcium channel antagonists pregabalin(Drug information on pregabalin) and gabapentin(Drug information on gabapentin)).

TABLE
Overview of drugs used in combination FMS therapy

However, response to monotherapy usually is incomplete. There is about a 30% reduction of pain for most patients, and these modest pain improvements typically are seen with the use of high drug doses that many patients do not tolerate.

An obvious strategy for improving therapeutic effectiveness is combining anchor drugs that have different mechanisms of action (Table). In a randomized, open-label study of patients with FMS for whom pregabalin monotherapy was not successful, the addition of milnacipran, 50 mg taken twice daily, resulted in significantly more patients "much" or "very much" improved compared with those who received prega­balin maintenance therapy alone (65% vs 25%; P < .001)5; combination-treatment patients also had significantly lower pain scores. Combination therapy also improved the tolerability of adverse effects often seen with monotherapy; 13% of the combination-therapy patients experienced nausea compared with 37% for milnaci­pran in labeled data, and 8% of the combination-therapy group patients had dizziness compared with 38% in pregabalin registration trials.

Although combination therapy with the indicated medications is preferred, many patients cannot afford the high cost of these drugs. Because generic SNRIs and α2δ calcium channel antagonists are available, combining these agents may improve efficacy and tolerability at lower cost.

In another study, patients with neuropathy for whom gabapentin monotherapy was not successful experienced significant pain reduction and global improvement when the SNRI venlafaxine was added.6 The combination treatment was well tolerated, and patients showed reductions in many symptoms often seen in FMS, including fatigue, insomnia, and mood disturbances. However, all combination-therapy studies to date have been small, and larger studies are needed to better understand the risks and benefits.

TABLE
Overview of drugs used in combination FMS therapy (continued)

Both anticonvulsants and antidepressants carry boxed warnings for suicidality. Therefore, patients who are treated with combination therapy should be monitored for suicidal thoughts, particularly those who have psychiatric disorders.

Goldenberg and associates7 found that the combination of the TCA amitriptyline(Drug information on amitriptyline), 25 mg taken at night, and the SSRI fluoxetine, 20 mg taken in the morning, works better than either drug alone for improving pain, global well-being, and sleep disturbances in patients with FMS; adverse effects were minimal. The synergy between the drugs is thought to be the result of amitriptyline increasing the norepinephrine re­uptake inhibition of fluoxetine.

In another small, randomized study, the combination of fluoxetine, 20 mg/d, and cyclobenza­prine, 10 mg/d, was superior to cyclobenzaprine, 10 mg/d, alone in improving FMS pain and morning stiffness.8 Because cyclobenzaprine is a TCA similar to amitriptyline, the synergy with fluoxetine probably is the result of a mechanism similar to that of amitriptyline with fluoxetine. However, patients taking multiple serotonin-active medications are at increased risk for serotonin syndrome.9 Physicians should discuss the risks with patients and monitor them for toxicity.

ADDING MEDICATIONS TO MANAGE SPECIFIC SYMPTOMS

Although some patients have improvement of all FMS symptoms with the use of anchor combination therapy, many continue to have problematic symptoms. Drugs may be added to manage specific FMS symptoms. (Note that medication uses in this section are off-label and published data for the use of these agents in patients with FMS are limited.)

Wakefulness-promoting agents and stimulants for fatigue and fibrofog

Many patients experience fatigue that manifests physically as activity-induced exhaustion and mentally as fibrofog. Although long-term management of fatigue in patients with FMS should be based on improving sleep quality and fitness level, stimulants and wakefulness-promoting agents can improve fatigue symptoms in the short term.10

Modafinil and armodafinil are wakefulness-promoting agents indicated for daytime sleepiness associated with obstructive sleep apnea, narcolepsy, and shift work syndrome. Modafinil(Drug information on modafinil) has shown effectiveness in improving fatigue associated with multiple disorders, including FMS,11 at doses of 50 to 400 mg given once or twice daily. Because armodafinil is the active R-enantiomer of racemic modafinil, this agent would be expected to have similar efficacy but with the added benefits of once-daily dosing, lower cost, and improved tolerability. However, the only published trial of armodafinil for FMS fatigue did not show efficacy.12

Both modafinil and armodafinil have the potential for drug interactions because they affect multi­ple cytochrome P-450 isoenzymes and are bound to plasma proteins. Although the adverse effects typically are milder with modafinil and armodafinil, they are similar to those seen with stimulants; patients with insomnia, cardiovascular disease, and psychiatric disorders should be monitored for symptom worsening.13

Stimulants often are used to manage FMS fatigue and fibrofog because they are inexpensive and typically there are few insurance restrictions on their use. Patients with FMS have cognitive deficits similar to those of patients with adult attention-deficit/hyper­activity disorder (ADHD),14 and adult patients who have ADHD with FMS treated with stimulants have shown improvement in multiple FMS symptoms.15

A full discussion of the risks and benefits of stimulants can be found in a recent review.10 However, a "start low and go slow" approach is recommended: a low, short-acting dose is given when the patient awakens, followed by the addition of a second dose at noon, if necessary, before a once-daily, long-acting formulation is used. For example, 5 mg of methylphenidate(Drug information on methylphenidate) is taken in the morning for 1 week before adding a second dose at noon for a second week and then increasing to 10 mg twice daily for a third week before switching to a 20-mg once-daily sustained-release pill.

Because wakefulness-promoting agents and stimulants have addiction potential, their use in patients with a history of addiction is discouraged and urine drug screening is encouraged to detect diversion. When wakefulness-promoting agents and stimulants have been added to anti­depressant therapy, both have been associated with serotonin syndrome and manic episodes.10

Pages: 1  2  
Next
 

Join the Conversation

Want to join the conversation? If you're a healthcare professional, we'd like to hear your comments. Just sign in or register today to become part of our growing, online community.






 
TOPIC INDEX

  • Arthritis
  • Fibromyalgia
  • Geriatrics
  • Gout
  • Imaging
  • Juvenile Arthritis
  • Lupus
  • Osteoarthritis
  • Osteoporosis
  • Pain
  • Rheumatoid Arthritis
  • Women


 
MOST POPULAR
  • Most Popular
  • Most Emailed
  • Most Recent

  • Iontophoretic Administration of Dexamethasone for Musculoskeletal Pain
  • Managing degenerative lumbar spinal stenosis
  • Evaluating edema of the hands
  • Iliopsoas Bursitis
  • Rash Questions for Rheumatologists
  • Diagnosis and Management of Complex Regional Pain Syndrome
  • Botox Adds New Wrinkle to Debated Hyaluronic Acid Treatments for Knee OA
  • OARSI Adopts Tests for Physical Function in Hip and Knee OA
  • Idiopathic Chilblains
  • AAOS Weighs in Against Hyaluronic Acid for Knee OA
  • Azathioprine Not Linked to Flare Risk in Lupus Nephritis Pregnancies
  • Methotrexate Failures in RA, Ustekinumab Success in PsA, and Mood-Immunity Links
  • Quick Relapse After Stopping TNF Inhibitors in Peripheral Spondylitis
  • OK to Cut Back TNF-Alpha Blockers in Stable Ankylosing Spondylitis
  • In Primary Sjögrens, Hydroxychloroquine Ineffective in Short-Term
Click here to subscribe to our newsletter





CancerNetwork | ConsultantLive | Diagnostic Imaging | Musculoskeletal Network | OBGYN.net | PediatricsConsultantLive |
Physicians Practice | Psychiatric Times | SearchMedica | Medical Resources

© 1996 - 2013 UBM Medica LLC, a UBM company
Privacy Statement - Terms of Service - Advertising Information - Editorial Policy Statement - UBM Medica Network Privacy Policy