TheJournalofMusculoskeletalMedicine Members: Login | Register
TheJournalofMusculoskeletalMedicine SearchMedica Medline Drugs

Powered by SearchMedica

 
Biomechanics
Clinical Update
Citations
Geriatrics
RA Resources
Osteoarthritis
Osteoporosis
Photo Quiz
Multimedia
Patient Education
 


Diagnostic Imaging. Vol. 32 No. 5
 

How to get the gain without the pain in shift to 3T MR

Cleveland's MetroHealth ramps from 1.5T in four days after staff trains on lower strength platform

By Greg Freiherr | May 26, 2010

With its add-on software and higher performance coils, field-upgradeable MR scanners are the lifeblood of the imaging community. But systems with upgradeable fields are rare.

Philips Healthcare debuted the idea at RSNA 2006, touting its Achieva XR as the first and, so far, only 1.5T product that can be upgraded in the field to 3T. Thirty-nine of these multifield systems have been put in place since the device's unveiling. Philips argued that its Achieva XR can serve as a kind of insurance policy against obsolescence. Customers not ready to take the leap to 3T, Philips said, can use the Achieva XR at 1.5T indefinitely with the assurance that a higher field strength is just an upgrade away.

MetroHealth bought the scanner but not the argument. The 500-bed hospital ran its Achieva XR at 1.5T for only a month before ramping it to 3T. The idea was to teach staff the new Philips interface using a familiar field strength.

“We had some reservations about making this double jump, going to a new platform and going to 3T, so this offered us the opportunity to ease into it,” said Pedro Diaz, Ph.D., vice chair of imaging and informatics systems at MetroHealth.

Replacing its existing 1.5T scanner with the new Achieva XR spanned several weeks, according to Diaz. But the transition from 1.5T to 3T was done in a few days.

Scanning at 3T then began with the same user interface as at 1.5T, using the same patient setup, same coils, and, consequently, the same knowledge base. What staff had learned to do at 1.5T was applicable at 3T, Diaz said.

“Philips did a really good job of helping us find the replacement sequences for 3T,” he said.

Typically sites making this jump must compare images at the two field strengths taken on wholly different machines, possibly from different vendors. The Achieva XR provided MetroHealth the opportunity to directly compare 1.5T and 3T images taken under conditions that differed only in field strength. This baseline allowed staff to determine which patients are best imaged on the 3T Achieva and which on the 1.5T Philips scanner, also newly acquired.

The only cases now going automatically to 3T at MetroHealth are the obvious ones: spectroscopy, diffusion tensor imaging, and functional imaging. High-resolution brain angiography is done, when warranted, at 3T. Conversely, body MR scans that Diaz thought could be done only on the 1.5T machine because of artifacts typically associated with 3T, can, in fact, be done on the higher field scanner.

Both machines can handle routine scans. Achieva XR offers advantages in speed, due to the improved signal-to-noise ratio available at 3T, with the option of trading speed for better resolution. This kind of interchangeability was the goal behind MetroHealth's transition to two Philips high-field scanners.

“One of our fears was that everyone would want to have every patient done at 3T,” Diaz said. “The way we did it allowed us to make convincing arguments about what really absolutely needed to be done at 3T.”

 

Join the Conversation

Want to join the conversation? If you're a healthcare professional, we'd like to hear your comments. Just sign in or register today to become part of our growing, online community.






 
TOPIC INDEX

  • Arthritis
  • Fibromyalgia
  • Geriatrics
  • Gout
  • Juvenile Arthritis
  • Lupus
  • Musculoskeletal Imaging
  • Orthopedic Surgery
  • Osteoarthritis
  • Osteoporosis
  • Pain
  • Rheumatoid Arthritis
  • Rheumatic Diseases
  • Sports Injuries
  • Women


 
MOST POPULAR
  • Most Popular
  • Most Emailed
  • Most Recent
  • Clinical management of muscle strains and tears
  • Managing degenerative lumbar spinal stenosis
  • MRI for Evaluating Knee Pain in Older Patients: How Useful Is It?
  • Sports injuries in weekend warriors: 20 Clinical pearls
  • Diagnosing fibromyalgia: Moving away from tender points
  • Current Approaches to Pain Management for Patients
    With Osteoarthritis
  • Top 10 Lupus Achievements in 2011

  • Iontophoretic Administration of Dexamethasone for Musculoskeletal Pain
  • Osteoarthritis diagnosis: Avoiding the pitfalls
  • Clinical management of muscle strains and tears
  • The Watson Scaphoid Shift Test
  • Wrist Pain in a 30-Year-Old Woman
  • Judging Osteoporosis Screening Intervals From the Latest T Score
  • Physician Referrals Mounting, and Costs Too?
  • Knee Replacement Surgery for Osteoarthritis on the Rise
Click here to subscribe to our newsletter


 
SearchMedica Search Result

Find peer-reviewed literature and websites for practicing medical professionals

CME on Osteoarthritis
Evidence on Osteoarthritis
Guidelines on Osteoarthritis
Patient Education on Osteoarthritis
Clinical Trials on Osteoarthritis
Practical Articles on Osteoarthritis
Research and Reviews on Osteoarthritis
All "Osteoarthritis" results



CancerNetwork | CME LLC | ConsultantLive | Diagnostic Imaging | Musculoskeletal Network | OBGYN.net | PediatricsConsultantLive |
Physicians Practice | Psychiatric Times | SearchMedica | Medical Resources

© 1996 - 2012 UBM Medica LLC, a UBM company
Privacy Statement - Terms of Service - Advertising Information - Editorial Policy Statement - UBM Medica Network Privacy Policy