TheJournalofMusculoskeletalMedicine Members: Login | Register
TheJournalofMusculoskeletalMedicine SearchMedica Medline Drugs

Powered by SearchMedica

 
Biomechanics
Clinical Update
Citations
Geriatrics
RA Resources
Osteoarthritis
Osteoporosis
Photo Quiz
Multimedia
Patient Education
 


Diagnostic Imaging. Vol. 32 No. 5
Pages: 1  2  3  4  
Next
 

Imaging tools help refine diagnosis of osteoporosis

Accurate, reproducible methods of quantifying bone density help predict fracture risk, determine intervention, and monitor therapy response

By Giuseppe Guglielmi, M.D., and Giacomo Scalzo, M.D. | May 26, 2010
Prof. Gugliemi is a musculoskeletal radiologist at the University of Foggia and the Scientific Institute Hospital in San Giovanni Rotondo, province of Foggia, Italy. Dr. Scalzo is a musculoskeletal radiologist at the University of Foggia.

Bone mineral density measurements of the axial and appendicular skeleton are an important part of the diagnosis and follow-up of metabolic bone disease. This is particularly true for osteoporosis, a disorder characterized by compromised bone strength. The reduction in density and quality of bone leads to an increased risk of fracture.

The incidence of osteoporotic fractures increases with age. Osteoporosis could, consequently, become a significant social/healthcare problem in developed countries where the population is aging.

An early diagnosis of osteoporosis is fundamental to preventing complications and unnecessary suffering. This is now possible using precise imaging methods. The two main aims of imaging are to identify the presence of osteoporosis, and to calculate bone mass using semiquantitative or quantitative methods. Conventional radiography is typically used for the former, densitometric techniques for the latter.

The radiological appearance of osteoporosis is essentially always the same, irrespective of the cause. Osteoporosis is still most commonly diagnosed on conventional radiography, a modality that is widely available. This is despite the advent of newer, highly accurate and precise quantitative diagnostic imaging techniques, such as dual x-ray absorptiometry (DXA) and quantitative CT (QCT).

Conventional radiography is useful, both alone and in conjunction with CT or MRI, when detecting complications of osteopenia (e.g., fractures), for the differential diagnosis of osteopenia, or for follow-up examinations in specific clinical settings, such as progression of soft tissue calcifications, or signs of secondary hyperparathyroidism and osteomalacia in renal osteodystrophy. It is relatively insensitive to the detection of early disease, though. A substantial amount of bone loss (~30%) must occur before it can be detected on x-ray images. Variations in radiographic exposure factors, film development, and patients' soft tissue thickness can also make it difficult to diagnose early signs of osteoporosis.

Figure 1The main radiographic features of generalized osteoporosis are cortical thinning and increased radiolucency.1 Vertebral fractures are a frequent complication of osteoporosis. Although osteopenia cannot be diagnosed reliably from plain-film x-ray images, spinal radiography can help considerably when diagnosing and following up vertebral fractures (Figure 1). Vertebral height measurements can also be made on plain-film x-rays, reducing subjectivity.

Compression fractures can occur anywhere in the spine, although T4-L4 is the most common site. A vertebral fracture appears as an alteration in the shape and size of the vertebral body. A wedge is seen when the anterior vertebral body height is reduced in relation to posterior height. Reduced midstructure height in relation to posterior height is visualized as an endplate (mono- or biconcave), and when all heights of a vertebra are reduced in relation to the dimensions of adjacent vertebrae, this is seen as a crush, or collapse, vertebral deformity.

The posterior height of the thoracic vertebrae is normally 1 to 3 mm greater than the anterior height. A height loss of more than 4 mm is considered a true vertebral fracture deformity. This criterion is also used for lumbar vertebrae, although differences between anterior and posterior heights are not as large in lumbar vertebrae as they are in the thoracic spine. The shapes of vertebrae and their dimensions, as well as their posterior border, should be compared with those of adjacent vertebrae when defining a fracture.2

Pages: 1  2  3  4  
Next
 

Join the Conversation

Want to join the conversation? If you're a healthcare professional, we'd like to hear your comments. Just sign in or register today to become part of our growing, online community.






 
TOPIC INDEX

  • Arthritis
  • Fibromyalgia
  • Geriatrics
  • Gout
  • Juvenile Arthritis
  • Lupus
  • Musculoskeletal Imaging
  • Orthopedic Surgery
  • Osteoarthritis
  • Osteoporosis
  • Pain
  • Rheumatoid Arthritis
  • Rheumatic Diseases
  • Sports Injuries
  • Women


 
MOST POPULAR
  • Most Popular
  • Most Emailed
  • Most Recent
  • Clinical management of muscle strains and tears
  • Managing degenerative lumbar spinal stenosis
  • MRI for Evaluating Knee Pain in Older Patients: How Useful Is It?
  • Sports injuries in weekend warriors: 20 Clinical pearls
  • Diagnosing fibromyalgia: Moving away from tender points
  • Current Approaches to Pain Management for Patients
    With Osteoarthritis
  • Top 10 Lupus Achievements in 2011

  • Iontophoretic Administration of Dexamethasone for Musculoskeletal Pain
  • Osteoarthritis diagnosis: Avoiding the pitfalls
  • Clinical management of muscle strains and tears
  • The Watson Scaphoid Shift Test
  • Wrist Pain in a 30-Year-Old Woman
  • Judging Osteoporosis Screening Intervals From the Latest T Score
  • Physician Referrals Mounting, and Costs Too?
  • Knee Replacement Surgery for Osteoarthritis on the Rise
Click here to subscribe to our newsletter


 
SearchMedica Search Result

Find peer-reviewed literature and websites for practicing medical professionals

CME on Osteoarthritis
Evidence on Osteoarthritis
Guidelines on Osteoarthritis
Patient Education on Osteoarthritis
Clinical Trials on Osteoarthritis
Practical Articles on Osteoarthritis
Research and Reviews on Osteoarthritis
All "Osteoarthritis" results



CancerNetwork | CME LLC | ConsultantLive | Diagnostic Imaging | Musculoskeletal Network | OBGYN.net | PediatricsConsultantLive |
Physicians Practice | Psychiatric Times | SearchMedica | Medical Resources

© 1996 - 2012 UBM Medica LLC, a UBM company
Privacy Statement - Terms of Service - Advertising Information - Editorial Policy Statement - UBM Medica Network Privacy Policy